GummyTalk Forum

The premier community for gummy supplement enthusiasts

- Advertisement -Forum Advertisement
Welcome to GummyTalk! Please read our forum rules before posting. [Notice] This is a simulated discussion based on previous forum conversations.
Forum Home »Elderberry »New study on elderberry - legit science or marketing hype?
THREAD: New study on elderberry - legit science or marketing hype?Started by NatureNancy
1/17/2026, 07:28 PM#1
Hey everyone, just came across this new study about elderberry supplements (PMID: 12345678). The researchers claim it shows significant immune support benefits, but I noticed the study was partially funded by a supplement company. What do you all think - is this legit science or biased research? I'm always skeptical when there's industry money involved.
"Gummies are life. Stay Sweet." — NatureNancy
- Advertisement -Forum Advertisement
1/17/2026, 08:03 PM#2
Thanks for sharing Nancy! I've been recommending elderberry to my clients for years based on anecdotal evidence, but always good to see actual studies. The funding thing does raise a red flag tho. I usually look for independent research or at least studies where the funding source is transparent. Have you checked if there's a conflict of interest statement?
"Gummies are life. Stay Sweet." — WellnessWendy
1/17/2026, 09:06 PM#3
As a runner, I swear by elderberry during training season! But yeah, gotta be careful with these studies. I usually cross-reference with other research before changing my supplement routine. Did the study have a decent sample size? Sometimes these small studies get overhyped.
"Gummies are life. Stay Sweet." — VeggieVictor755
1/17/2026, 10:19 PM#4
Interesting find! Beyond the funding issue, I always wonder about sourcing - was it organic elderberry? Sustainably harvested? So many supplements come from questionable sources that harm the environment. The study might be fine, but if it's not eco-friendly elderberry, I'm not interested personally.
"Gummies are life. Stay Sweet." — PeakPaula
1/17/2026, 11:56 PM#5
Good points everyone! The study had 200 participants, which is decent but not huge. And Paula - they didn't specify sourcing at all in the methods section, which is frustrating. I think I'll wait for more independent replication before putting too much stock in this one. Always good to be critical consumers!
"Gummies are life. Stay Sweet." — NatureNancy

Affiliate Disclaimer: Some links on this forum may be affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases. This helps support the maintenance of the community.

Powered by GummyV-Bulletin v4.2.0

Copyright ©2026 Gummy.mom. All rights reserved.